Key Thoughts:
The new world of hybrid working is complicated and changing all the time.
It is tempting to put off major decisions until this has settled down and the labour market has organised into a new stable set of norms.
I don’t think this will happen within the next few years.
The dynamics of today’s hybrid labour market form a complex system, which is therefore inherently unpredictable.
This is uncomfortable because preserving optionality will be expensive.
But making significant commitments on the assumption that any one model will prevail is risky, particularly for businesses with lots of interdependencies.
Instead family businesses like any other organisation must accept that the way we work is going to be unpredictable and take decisions which are resilient to this change, rather than try and ‘see round corners.’
In a tight labour market where talent is scarce family business should make a virtue of their optionality and flexibility on this issue to attract talent.
Family business pride themselves on valuing trust between them and their stakeholders. Some businesses really struggle with hybrid working because they simply don’t trust their employees to be productive when WFH. They need to be able to see it or measure it. Family business could again differentiate themselves here by having faith in their employees to “do the right thing”?
Email is 51 years old and has been a staple tool of office workers for at least 25 years. However, in that time we still haven’t really adopted a set of ubiquitous norms; we still receive 100’s of messages a day and use basically the same workflow for ‘fancy a brew’ and ‘please see attached a multimillion pound contract.’
If we haven’t been able to come up with a standard approach to using that mature, stable 25+ year old technology, the idea that we are going to quickly settle on new ways of working after the shock of the pandemic is a pipe-dream.
We have all made discoveries we cannot unmake. We’ve learnt that it is possible to run many business-critical processes from home. The teams or zoom call is not nearly as horrible as the early video-conferences. Staff working from home can be just as productive as those in the office. This gives us enormous possibilities; and our staff get to save the time lost in commuting and reinvest that into their fitness, their family or any number of other wellbeing enhancing activities. No wonder so many finance directors look at the real estate costs and see opportunities for savings.
Others, faced with a sunk cost of long term leases are trying all sorts of experiments to fill those desks on Mondays and Fridays from free lunches to surge-pricing desk recharge schemes. Even the weekend, Henry Ford’s 96-year old invention, might be up for renegotiation, traded away for a 4 days in 7 flexible work pattern and childcare savings.
It’s no wonder that those faced with a major decision today, such as whether to invest in more space, or whether to adopt a new home working policy are finding that call hard to make. How long should we wait for things to settle down?
My advice is not to wait at all. I think the only sensible forecast about the future is that its going to be uncertain for a while.
Let’s look at things from our staff’s point of view. For them, we have inadvertently created a new set of incentives around coming to the office. Pre-pandemic, a season ticket for the train or a car park was good value. But we don’t buy the season ticket for 2 days per week. We pay as you go. And that means the marginal cost of a trip to the office has gone from £3 for a coffee perhaps £20 or £30. Now commuting is an investment decision. The day in the office has to be worth it. And now, getting your team all in on the same day is an exercise in game theory.
Family business pride themselves on valuing trust between them and their stakeholders. Some businesses really struggle with hybrid working because they simply don’t trust their employees to be productive when working from home. They need to be able to see the work being done or measure it. Family business could again differentiate themselves here by having faith in their employees to “do the right thing.”
But when it comes to other stakeholders, we need to take account of the way they’ve chosen to work. How often have we rearranged our whole week so we can come in on a different day to meet that important customer? And then asked all the other people we were going to meet to shuffle their diaries. That creates a whiplash effect whereby the diaries of our junior staff are constantly changing. And until we get some amazing AI-based, high frequency trading algorithms constantly shuffling our appointments, this is going to make life unpredictable for some time yet.
While firms are trying different approaches, staff will move from one place to another; and in a seller’s market for talent the best staff will seek an organisation that flexes to suit them, not the other way around. In a tight labour market where talent is scarce